Quality journalism hinges on reliability. On the Sugar Daddy Belgiëblog we regard every published text as a promise to our readers: you deserve accurate, verified information. When we fail to keep that promise, we take responsibility.
Our editorial philosophy
In an era of fast-paced news cycles and viral disinformation, we deliberately take a different approach. Our editorial team applies the principle “better slow and correct than fast and wrong”. Specifically, this means that every article is proofread by at least two team members before it goes online, and if in doubt, we always consult additional sources.
Accuracy over speed
We publish only when the facts are verified. A scoop is worthless if it turns out to be false.
Transparency in the event of errors
Making mistakes is human. Hiding them is unacceptable. We communicate openly about what went wrong and why.
Learning and improving
Every correction is an opportunity to evaluate our work processes and prevent future errors.
Belgian legal framework
Our correction policy is not only an ethical choice, but also complies with Belgian laws on press rights and privacy. Two laws form the backbone here:
⚖️ Act of 23 June 1961 - Right of reply
This Belgian law guarantees that any person mentioned in a publication has the right to respond. The response must be submitted within three months of publication and the publisher is obliged to post it free of charge.
What this means for you: Do you feel aggrieved by an article on our blog? You are legally entitled to a rebuttal which we will publish, provided it meets the legal conditions (no insults, limited to the facts in question).
🔐 AVG/GDPR - Right of rectification (Article 16)
The General Data Protection Regulation gives European citizens the right to have inaccurate personal data corrected. This also applies to published content containing personal information.
What this means for you: Does an article contain incorrect information about you personally? Besides an editorial correction, you can also submit a formal AVG request for rectification of your personal data.
To which this policy applies
✓ Well applicable
- All blog articles and editorial content
- Informative guides and manuals
- News items and press releases
- Guest posts and collaborative articles
- FAQ pages and help content
✗ Not applicable
- User profiles and personal descriptions
- Private messages between members
- Forum contributions and comments
- Content provided by advertisers
- Users' social media posts
For user content issues, please refer to our Active Response Policy and the Terms of use.
Our verification process before publication
Prevention is better than cure. That is why every article goes through a strict verification process before it is published:
Source check
At least two independent sources for factual claims
Peer review
Second editor reads critically for facts and logic
Figure check
All statistics and numbers are double-checked
Final editing
Final check on language, style and consistency
Categorisation of adjustments
Not every change is a correction. We distinguish between four categories, each with its own approach and visibility:
🔴 Correction
A factual inaccuracy that affects the substance of the information. Think: wrong dates, wrong figures, incorrect names or titles, faulty source references.
Example: “This article stated that Belgium has a population of 11 million. The correct number is 11.5 million (2024).”
Display
Correction [date]: ...
🟠 Clarification
The original text was not wrong, but could be misinterpreted. Additional context prevents misunderstandings.
Example: “To clarify, by ‘sugar dating’ we mean relationships between adults based on mutual agreements, not transactional contacts.”
Display
Clarification [date]: ...
🔵 Update
New information relevant to the topic. The original text was correct at the time of publication but is now outdated or incomplete.
Example: “Update: since January 2025, Belgian legislation on online dating platforms has changed. See the new guidelines below.”
Display
Update [date]: ...
🟣 Rectification or withdrawal
The substance of the article is found to be inaccurate, misleading or harmful. This requires a thorough revision or full retraction with explanation.
Example: “This article has been retracted. Upon further investigation, the cited study was found not to be peer-reviewed. We apologise for the dissemination of unreliable information.”
Display
Corrigendum [date]: ...
📌 Our basic principle: Substantial changes are always made visible. Only purely linguistic changes (spelling errors that do not affect meaning) can be made without disclosure.
How can you report an error?
Our readers are our best fact checkers. Did you spot a possible error? We appreciate your attentiveness and treat every report seriously.
📧 Send your report to correcties@sugardaddybelgium.eu
The more complete your report, the faster we can act. If possible, please include the following:
Exact location
URL of the article + passage where the error occurs
What is not right?
Clearly describe which information you believe is incorrect
What is right?
The correct information if you know it
Proof
Links, documents or other sources supporting your claim
Our response times
24u
Receipt confirmation
48-72u
Initial assessment
5 days
Final decision*
* For complex cases that require additional investigation, we will inform you of the expected timeframe.
Right of reply - Your legal protection
As a Belgian platform, we respect the legal right of reply, a fundamental press right in our country. This right differs from an ordinary correction:
When do you have a right of reply?
- You will be explicitly mentioned in an article (by name or clearly identifiable)
- The publication contains factual claims about you that you wish to refute or nuance
- You will submit your response within three months upon publication
- Your response is limited to the specific claims in the article
How do you submit a response?
- Mail to beroep@sugardaddybelgium.eu
- State your full name and relation to the article
- Add the URL of the article in question
- Your answer may not exceed 1,000 words amounts
- Where possible, substantiate your position with documentation
📌 Important: A right of reply is different from a correction request. With a correction, we determine the text; with a right of reply, we publish your text (provided it meets the legal requirements).
Personal data in articles
When an article contains personal data, you have specific rights under the AVG/GDPR. These can be exercised in addition to or instead of the editorial correction process:
More information on our data processing can be found in our Privacy policy.
Change log for articles
Transparency also means traceability. This is why every article that has been substantially modified contains a visible log at the bottom of the page. So you can always check which changes were made and when:
📋 Amendment history
15/09/2025 14:30 CET
Correction: The percentage of singles in Belgium has been adjusted from 35% to 38%, based on recent figures from Statbel (2024).
02/09/2025 09:15 CET
Update: Added new section on safety at first encounters, following feedback from our community.
28/08/2025 16:45 CET
Clarification: Added extra context to the term ‘arrangement’ to avoid misunderstandings.
Frequently asked questions
I disagree with an opinion in an article. Is that a correction? +
No. Our correction policy covers only factual inaccuracies. This does not include differences of opinion, different interpretations or editorial choices. However, you can send in a reader response, which we may consider publishing.
An article contains accurate information about me that I would prefer to see removed. Is that possible? +
This is not a correction but a deletion request. Corrected information of legitimate public interest will in principle remain published. In exceptional cases (e.g. security risks), we may make a trade-off. Contact us at privacy@sugardaddybelgium.eu to discuss your situation.
How do I know if my correction request is being processed? +
You will receive an automatic acknowledgement of receipt with a reference number within 24 hours. An editor will then process your request and you will receive an initial substantive response within 48-72 hours. In more complex cases, we will keep you informed of progress.
Can I report a mistake anonymously? +
Yes, we also handle anonymous reports. However, please note that without contact details we cannot provide feedback on the handling of your report.
What if I am not satisfied with the handling of my request? +
You can submit an appeal at beroep@sugardaddybelgium.eu. This will be handled by a different team member from the one who handled your original request. For disputes about personal data, you can also file a complaint with the Belgian Data Protection Authority (GBA).
Contact overview
Corrections & errors
correcties@sugardaddybelgium.eu
Appeals & right of reply
beroep@sugardaddybelgium.eu
Privacy & AVG requests
privacy@sugardaddybelgium.eu
Last revision of this policy
September 2025
This policy is reviewed periodically.
Changes will be announced on our website.